[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ARSCLIST] Recording bagpipes (was:portable sound recording devices)
At 4/18/2006 06:34 PM, David Lewiston wrote:
When recording such a loud instrument, the mic should not be too
close to it. For pipes & shawms I prefer not to place the mics
closer than 20 feet. Because such loud instruments are intended to
be heard out of doors, that's where I record them.
The highland pipes are among the most complex instruments to record,
because the sound comes from two different places: the drones are
over the piper's shoulder, moving sound in one direction, while the
chanter is forward, pushing sound in another direction. And to make
things even more difficult, the piper is often pacing back and forth,
so the sources of the sound moves with him (or in this case, her).
You can either place separate microphones close to the chanter and
the drones, or move far enough away to get an acoustical mixture of both.
Many years ago, I discussed this question with radio producers and
recording engineers at BBC Scotland, who told me that they sometimes
used as many as eight or more microphones to record a solo piper in
stereo. I probably still have the diagram someplace.
The alternative to all that hardware would be a stereo pair located
about 15-20 feet away. If it's indoors, the volume level will be
extremely high due to reverberation off the walls, so the discussion
in this thread about overload kicks in; if it's outdoors, the
distance should be enough to modulate the sound level, but the pipes
will sound "off-mike" with omni-directional microphones.
If it was me, I would try to record outdoors, on a day without wind,
using a pair of directional microphones. It might take some
experimenting to find the best combination of presence and