[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ARSCLIST] Archiving at double speed
"Good quality" is somewhat relative. For comparisons on various sample-rate
converters, see here:
I believe the Sequoia engine is the same as Samplitude's... Correct me
Richard, if I'm wrong...
Anyway, I don't want to distract from the original thread - sample-rate
conversion aside, there are plenty of other reasons *not* to use
Sascom - Toronto
vox.905.825.5373 fax.905.469.1129 cel.905.580.2467
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List
> [mailto:ARSCLIST@xxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Richard L. Hess
> Sent: June 22, 2006 9:18 PM
> To: ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Archiving at double speed
> At 08:22 PM 6/22/2006, Mike Richter wrote:
> >There would not be great saving in the process since resampling is
> >slow if done well.
> Samplitude does resampling rather quickly - about 20x real time or
> so, depending on what you're doing. It can do some of it in "virtual
> mode" which doesn't take any time at all. And this resampling is
> quite good quality. This on a 3 GHz Hyperthreaded Pentium 4 with 1 GB
> of RAM, a dedicated SATA (not II) data drive, XP Home.
> Richard L. Hess email: richard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Aurora, Ontario, Canada (905) 713 6733 1-877-TAPE-FIX
> Detailed contact information:
> Quality tape transfers -- even from hard-to-play tapes.