[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ARSCLIST] FW: [ARSCLIST] w(h)ither Decca?
--- On Fri, 2/27/09, Thomas Stern <sternth@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> just noticed that this reply did NOT go to the list - anyone
> why 'reply' was directed to the personal id rather
> than to the list?
I'm getting that behavior more and more with Yahoo(! -sic)
mail. It doesn't parse the headers correctly. Who knows
why - Maybe they've adopted the "Standards are for Saps"
mentality of Microsoft. I'm starting to use "Reply All"
to mailing list replies and just cutting out the addresses
that are superfluous.
> SO - is the DECCA label and other historic labels being
> phased out
> in favor of a comprehensive brand???
The Decca label disappeared in the US about the time
Universal's parent, MCA, bought it. That was some time
in the late 60s if I remember correctly. All the record
labels MCA bought were subsumed under the "MCA Records"
label. I was surprised to hear the Decca label had made
a comeback in the US. Did this have something to do with
British Decca (released as "London" here since some time in
the 1950s) changing hands?