[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ARSCLIST] wire recordings - archival storage
Scott D. Smith wrote:
I always thought all the wire made by W-C was stainless as well, but
apparently there were at least couple of different grades (which I've
seen reference to in some literature from the 1940s. Would have to dig
for the source).
I would be very interested in your reference to this when you get a chance.
I have seen some wire which has exhibited a crystalline
type of oxidation (usually easily cleaned).
I've seen this also. To me oxidation is rust, but this is definitely
some environmental reaction. It does not seem to effect the recording
or the integrity of the wire in the least. And I find it more often on
the metal spool itself than the actual wire.
I've never really experienced any issues with print-through on wires.
I hadn't either until very recently. A very loud volume passage on a
wire definitely could be heard seconds later. It could be argued that
that low level garbling that is frequently heard on wire could be
print-through. On the other hand, it could be incomplete erasure of
previous recordings. I could never tell. Weighing tails out storage to
future playback equipment compatibility, I'd continue storing heads out
with a proper, even wind. Because, here's my question. After being
stored heads out for 50 or 60 years, how much worse can any
Angie Dickinson Mickle