[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
win a prize reading comment
- Subject: win a prize reading comment
- From: "Robert J. Milevski" <milevski@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 15 Jul 1994 09:22:51 -0400
- Message-id: <"mkYff2.n1.M23.N8T4l"@sul2>
Begin forwarded message: Reading is for those who unfortunately have
not had the benefit of (book arts) instructors/teachers/mentors
skilled in empirical teaching methods, who are natural, sympathetic,
and enthusiastic conveyors of their lifelong skills to those
(neophytes and novices and sometimes other skilled professionals)
willing and wanting to learn them. Better to be an apprentice or
intern to a great and knowledgeable (and hopefully humble, sharing,
and outgoing) craftsperson/artist than being an erudite, pedantic,
and book-learned fool who has little practical experience in the area
in which she/he wants to become expert(?).
Actually, reading should be a supplement and complement to one's life
experiences (in the book arts), especially in relation to learning
from those who have been working in the medium successfully,
recognizably, and professionally for a long time. Otherwise, we are
all watching the same reruns of Barney on television and stamping out
lookalike, undistinguished and boring Mickey Mouse watches. Books,
articles, and other printed/electronic knowledge/learning sources
merely augment real-life experiences which you have absorbed directly
and practically. Even with the information explosion, reading is
merely a surrogate to practical experience. This is in apposition to
those who temporarily adsorb knowledge and are merely insects
hanging/clinging on to their moments fascination. Any gadflys out
there?
Robert J. Milevski
Preservation Librarian
Princeton University Libraries
One Washington Road
Princeton, New Jersey 08544
609-258-5591; fax, 609-258-4105 or -5571; email,
milevski@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Comment: