[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: library cataloging
- To: BOOK_ARTS-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: library cataloging
- From: Richard Minsky <minsky@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 16 Apr 1997 12:06:15 -0400
- Message-id: <199704161616.JAA18180@SUL-Server-2.Stanford.EDU>
- Sender: "The Book Arts: binding, typography, collecting" <BOOK_ARTS-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>can also point and click to other web sites, so that something like the
>book arts list or Minsky Online could be included in a library catalog).
The advantage of maintaining a catalog link to a website is that the researcher accesses current info. The problem with it is that it is dependent on the maintenance of a site outside the control of the library. Sites like CoOl with this list's archive are institutional and likely to stay around, but something like Minsky Online may disappear. If a library wants to catalog such a site, it may be more reliable to keep a copy of the site on the library's computer. A "reader" could be given the option of accessing the archive or going online. An image-intensive site a local file should be faster than downloading online (although cable and cellular modems I believe are actually faster than hard drives).
There was a recent thread on exlibris about archiving websites. A library might want to maintain its own archive of a specialty subject (e.g., if the library maintains a book arts collection), or might want to link to a web archive library site (if that exists yet--it seemed to from one of Peter Graham's posts) as a backup in the event that a site is no longer online.