[Table of Contents] [Search]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Fw: pricing

Actually I thought that is what the oil companies did!!

Seriously, thanks to everyone for this great insight.

Lee Cooper
> From: Steven D. Hales <hales@xxxxxxxxxx>
> To: BOOK_ARTS-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: pricing
> Date: Tuesday, April 29, 1997 4:00 PM
> I'm a little puzzled by some of the attitudes expressed in this thread
> about pricing. Those who make a profession of binding, as opposed to
> of us who, like Peter, moonlight, seem to feel that they alone have a
> to bind for profit. Part-timers and moonlighters immorally steal their
> business through low rates.
> I cannot see any decent moral argument to be made for these conclusions.
> the first place, there is no reason to suppose that anyone has a right to
> clients. Put in reverse, it is false that all in need of binding services
> are morally obligated to take their business to only full-time
> professionals who charge top dollar. Moreover, we generally think that
> informed and consenting adults are free to enter into whatever
> (non-harmful) contracts they wish. Just because one is an amateur or
> part-timer does not abrogate this right to form contracts.
> Indeed, it seems to me that if anything is immoral here, it is the
> suggestion that we binders collude to fix prices at a high level.
> if oil companies all got together and agreed to double the retail price
> crude oil. And why not? They all deserve decent salaries, etc. etc. The
> consumer public would go ballistic at this. No bookbinder, professional
> otherwise, has an ethical expectation of any sort of income or salary at
> all.
> Steve
> Steven D. Hales
> Assistant Professor                     email: hales@xxxxxxxxxx
> Department of Philosophy                phone: (717) 389-4229
> Bloomsburg University                   fax: (717) 389-2094
> Bloomsburg, PA 17815

[Subject index] [Index for current month] [Table of Contents] [Search]