[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ? about posting - reply to sender/reply to all
- To: BOOK_ARTS-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: ? about posting - reply to sender/reply to all
- From: "Peter D. Verheyen" <pdverhey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 8 Sep 1997 15:22:27 -0400
- Message-id: <199709081922.MAA12886@SUL-Server-2.Stanford.EDU>
- Sender: "The Book Arts: binding, typography, collecting" <BOOK_ARTS-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
The list is set up so that replies automatically go to the list. Easier to
keep a list going that way. Otherwise all the good chats would be off-list
rather than on-list. Unfortuately, some email programs also let you fiddle
with settings. The upshot is, check to see what the To: line says in the
message before hitting send. It's confusing even to me. Hope this helps.
At 06:55 PM 9/8/97 UT, you wrote:
>This is a general question about posting:
>I recently tried replying privately to a post --
>very careful about hitting "reply to sender" vs.
>"reply to all" -- and the message was posted to
>On experimenting with the reply function on my
>program I am finding that on some (not all) of the
>addresses "reply to sender" comes up as:
>"The Book Arts: binding, typography, collecting"--
>which seems to go to the list.
>"Reply to All" comes up as:
>which would also go to the list.
>Can someone help me figure this out? A reply to
>the list might be helpful, as I think from different
>posts I'm reading that others might be having the
Der Buchbinder als Architekt des Buches baut eine
Fassade seiner Zeit. Edwin Redslob
Peter Verheyen, Conservation Librarian
Syracuse University Library
Syracuse, NY 13244