[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Definition of the Artists Book (YES, again)
- To: BOOK_ARTS-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Definition of the Artists Book (YES, again)
- From: Roberta Lavadour <paper@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 5 Mar 1998 07:37:50 -0800
- Message-id: <199803051550.HAA15704@SUL-Server-2.Stanford.EDU>
- Sender: "Book_Arts-L: The list for all the book arts!" <BOOK_ARTS-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
This process that your post has begun may in itself be defining the Artist's
Book. Could it be that that was your intent? I'm interested in the ways the
process has mimicked an artist's book...The project begins with a concept
which is then explored in various ways, sometimes with conflicting opinions,
then held together by a "thread", literal or figurative.
From: Peter Verheyen <pdverhey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: BOOK_ARTS-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <BOOK_ARTS-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wednesday, March 04, 1998 8:44 AM
Subject: Definition of the Artists Book (YES, again)
>We've had this debate before, but I'd like to pose this question again.
>Why, do I want to do this to myself again, well I'm giving a presentation
>to an Art History class on "artists books" and people have been clamoring
>for a definition.
>What I'd like is for people to think about this subject and submit a
>concise (1 paragraph) definition. I'll select a few of these and put them
>into a handout. If there's enough interest I may put them together as a
>web file and post on the Book Arts Web.
>Thanks for your help.
>Peter Verheyen, Listowner: Book_Arts-L
>315.443.9937 <wk> 315.443.9510 <fax>