[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Scan or shoot photos
- To: BOOK_ARTS-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Scan or shoot photos
- From: chrismccormick <chrismccormick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 11 Apr 1998 10:27:49 +0000
- Message-id: <199804111826.LAA18156@SUL-Server-2.Stanford.edu>
- Sender: "Book_Arts-L: On the web at http://www.dreamscape.com/pdverhey" <BOOK_ARTS-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
A few words from the photographic viewpoint: As I'm sure most of you know
archival paper can be used to copy a document onto. Inks on the highend printers
(Iris, Fiery etc) are being continually tested and their lifespan is increasing,
as long as protected from light.
Most likely a document printed on a fibre-based paper would not be sharp enough.
Any black & white photograph can be processed (archivally) to ensure a long
life. It is the processing not the paper that ensures an archival product. It
would be both costly and time consuming to attempt to conserve a book
photographically. The book could be scanned and the output written to film or CD
or any other storage media. I have not information on the original question
which asked about the potential harm from the light source used.
The writer may try contacting the PPA (Professional Photographers of America )
for an informed answer. http://www.ppa-world.org/
Photographic Fine Art Service
> a print is only as archival good as the paper it is printed on and laser toner
> is just melted plastic. Fiber based photographs are pretty archival from what
> my photo friends say. Also, photographs are continuois tone so they have
> better image quality. Laser printers produce grays by use of halftones.