[Table of Contents] [Search]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Learn this


I think this comparison is a wonderful way to consider the question.

All people are given,  to whatever degree,  an urge toward creativity,  right up
with their dose of intelligence.  Not all people will or should become the next
Michaelangelo,  but it's very exciting to watch someone who swears they haven't
got a creative bone in their body discover that 'spark' -- invariably
accompanied by the thrill of this "non-creative" person who is so excited to
learn he's not excluded from the ranks of the artistically inclined!  For a
highly analytical,  or otherwise 'noncreative', person to discover their
creative side enriches their life and adds beauty to the world (just as I would
also recommend that highly creative types not neglect their intellectual side:
imagine an artist being excused from learning math or science on the grounds
that they're not naturally gifted in this area!)

Thanks for putting it so well.


> Here is another view. I think Betty Edwards (Drawing From the Right Side of
> the Brain) was the one who pointed out that, first of all, art used to be
> taught as a craft, where young boys were apprenticed early and taught the
> skills they would need. They were not left to their own devices to be
> "creative." Teaching led to creativity, not away from it.
> Two, what if we were taught to read the way we are "taught" to draw? What if
> you shoved a bunch of kids in a room with books, explained the alphabet, and
> let them do their own thing? Would only the "talented" ones pick up reading?

            BOOK_ARTS-L: The listserv for all the book arts.
      For subscription information, the Archive, and other related
            resources and links go to the Book_Arts-L FAQ at:

[Subject index] [Index for current month] [Table of Contents] [Search]