[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [BKARTS] AIC Stuff
- To: BOOK_ARTS-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [BKARTS] AIC Stuff
- From: Bruce Levy <levybooks@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2003 12:57:06 -0500
- Message-id: <email@example.com>
- Sender: Book_Arts-L <BOOK_ARTS-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
I'm not sure who you are referring to. Personally, I have nevere
been slighted by the AIC. My observations and criticisms are based
on my experience with the AIC, and having kept up with the latest
information (they post many of their decisions and ideas for anyone
interested- a very good thing)one can see that not much has changed
since I left. When I left I was a professional associate in good
standing ( as they say).
One doesn't have to feel slighted to see the folly of the AIC being
the organ of certification. Nor should the open conversation end.
----- Original Message -----
From: Carol Pratt <jcpratt@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2003 10:06:30 -0700
Subject: Re: [BKARTS] AIC Stuff
> Except for a few posts (mostly from Peter and one or two others), I
> think this discussion has not really addressed salient issues. Is it a
> gripe session about the AIC? or a discussion about certification?
> The AIC isn't just a big happy group of book people. It includes all
> kinds of practitioners in conservation and restoration
> work...architecture, photography, objects (sculpture, furniture, glass,
> etc.), painting, prints, textiles, video, digital, even including
> scientists. There is a big emphasis on the science of conservation
> that has so far been ignored in this forum.
> Being a conservator means more than just "fixing" or restoring...it
> also means knowing when NOT to fix, when to stabilize instead, or when
> to do nothing. And what to do, when cutting isn't the best option.
> Yes, AIC has an affinity for the program-trained, and you can let it be
> a big major personal problem...Or not. I have friends in both camps,
> and there are strengths and weaknesses in BOTH camps . The
> certification issue is ipso facto happening, regardless of what AIC
> does. It's a fact in the UK, it's happening in Italy, and it's
> happening other places as well. It's happening here, too, guys,
> because this country has also a love affair for "credentials", i.e. the
> degree, the certificate, the license. Either some organization (like
> AIC) codifies it, or it will happen because the job market does it
> A bigger issue for me is whether the field is actually ready for
> certification. There are problems with education and training (there
> isn't a whole lot available, and some training opportunities are
> disappearing). A written and codified body of literature doesn't in
> general exist (yet, but it's being worked on). And there isn't even a
> whole lot of agreement on what conservation does or ought to do,
> although AIC has labored for years on this problem, having produced a
> code of ethics, guidelines, "practical commentaries". Yes, all
> produced by AIC activists, but who else is going to do it? Do we need
> these? I think we do.
> I am an AIC member and have been for nearly 15 years. I am apprentice-
> and self-trained. It is difficult to keep current with new
> information and to update and improve skills. Like the rest of you I
> happen to think that I do pretty good work, too, and I use AIC as a
> resource to help me continue to get better at what I do.
> It doesn't seem to me that most of this discussion has moved along very
> much from personal biases and memories of early slights.
> Carol Pratt
> Eugene, OR
*Postings may not be re-printed in any form without the express
consent of the author - Please respect their contributions & ©*
BOOK_ARTS-L: The listserv for all the book arts.
For subscription information, the Archive, and other related
resources and links go to the Book_Arts-L FAQ at:
Archive maintained and suppported by Conservation OnLine