[Table of Contents] [Search]


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [BKARTS] Altering books



how is this dogmatic and the original question isn't?

-----Original Message-----
From: Book_Arts-L [mailto:BOOK_ARTS-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of
Peter Verheyen
Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2003 11:34 AM
To: BOOK_ARTS-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Altering books

We can have most any kind of discussion and get dogmatic about it on this
list, but lets not go here. Ok?

p.

******************************

Philobiblon: Book Arts Different by Design
Peter D. Verheyen
<mailto:verheyen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<http://www.philobiblon.com>

On Tue, 16 Sep 2003, Mark Wilden wrote:

> Just in case no one else expresses what I hope at least some of us must be
> thinking--your employers are fundamentalist nutcases, and I think it's
> somewhat sad that we all sit around according them proper respect for their
> lunacy, instead of standing up for rationalism over ignorance with respect
> to the way children are educated.

             ***********************************************
     *Postings may not be re-printed in any form without the express
     consent of the author - Please respect their contributions & ©*

            BOOK_ARTS-L: The listserv for all the book arts.
      For subscription information, the Archive, and other related
            resources and links go to the Book_Arts-L FAQ at:
                      <http://www.philobiblon.com>

        Archive maintained and suppported by Conservation OnLine
                    <http://palimpsest.stanford.edu>
             ***********************************************


[Subject index] [Index for current month] [Table of Contents] [Search]