[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: weavers knot-
- To: BOOK_ARTS-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: weavers knot-
- From: Incline Press <books.inclinepress@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 15:17:06 +0000
- Delivered-to: whenry@stanford.edu
- In-reply-to: <C5DD4904.223EB%j.mackrell@cimdata.com>
- Message-id: <C5DD8672.17250%books.inclinepress@virgin.net>
- Reply-to: Book_Arts-L <BOOK_ARTS-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Thread-index: AcmiGXlQuAbKJA4MEd6VswARJDwtvAAP+CKTAADFlyU=
- Thread-topic: [BKARTS] weavers knot-
- User-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.4.0.080122
I only bind our own new books, and rarely full re-sews, so no 'old thread',
and I can position all knots behind tapes. I've never had any problem with
bulking of this knot. But horses for courses, and I can see that with repair
work there would be different problems to solve.
Graham Moss
Incline Press
36 Bow Street
Oldham OL1 1SJ England
http://www.inclinepress.com
On 11/3/09 14:55, "John MacKrell" <j.mackrell@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Two problems with the carrick bend in book sewing--it is more bulky than the
> weaver's knot and it can't be easily positioned on the old thread so the
> knot ends up where you want it to be (i.e., so it does not pull through at
> the next sewing station).
> Regards,
>
> John MacKrell
> ---
> Ann Arbor, Michigan
> (734) 604-0992
> See finishing stoves at www.johnmackrell.com
>
***********************************************
Please note that attachments to listserv messages are not permitted,
and are automatically removed by the listserver.
For all your subscription questions, go to the Book_Arts-L FAQ and Archive.
See <http://www.philobiblon.com> for full information.
***********************************************