The Abbey Newsletter

Volume 18, Number 8
Dec 1994


Two Deacidification Processes Evaluated; Reports Available from LC

[The Library of Congress recently evaluated the Bookkeeper and diethyl zinc processes. This brief summary of the two projects, which is dated December 23, was written by Kenneth E. Harris and Chandru J. Shahani, Preservation Projects Officers in the Preservation Directorate and the Preservation Research and Testing Office, respectively.]

Over the past two years, the Library of Congress continued its commitment to enhance and encourage the development of mass deacidification technologies through a two-part ActionPlan that was approved by Congress. Under Phase A of the plan, the Library pursued refinement of the diethyl zinc (DEZ) process. Phase B permitted the Library to offer a program of evaluation and testing to other promising deacidification technologies; under this provision, Preservation Technologies, Inc. (PTI) of Pittsburgh asked the Library to evaluate its Bookkeeper deacidification process. Copies of the reports on the two projects* are available from Kenneth E. Harris, Preservation Directorate, Library of Congress, LM-G21, Washington, DC 20540-4500 (202/707-1054; fax 707-3434; Internet KHAR@LOC.GOV.

With the DEZ process, the Library conducted a series of planned test runs in the Akzo Chemicals deacidification plant in Texas and succeeded in eliminating process-related problems that were experienced earlier with the DEZ technology. However, we note with disappointment that Akzo Chemicals withdrew from the deacidification business this past spring and terminated its DEZ license with the U.S. Commerce Department effective in September 1994. The Library has not requested Congressional support at this time for a DEZ initiative because of projected high DEZ capitalization costs and because of encouraging developments with the Bookkeeper process, which affords lower capitalization costs along with other attractive features.

Under the second phase of the Library's Action Plan, as indicated above, a Library-appointed evaluation team studied the Bookkeeper deacidification process. An earlier generation of PTI equipment, known as "Bookkeeper II," was being used by PTI when the Library's evaluation team initiated its examination of the Bookkeeper process over a year ago. Based upon results obtained with that earlier Bookkeeper equipment, the evaluation team concluded that the Bookkeeper process demonstrates the potential for meeting the Library's technical requirements for mass deacidification. The group indicated further that the process already meets many of the Library's specifications. The technical team also recommended that the Library work with PTI to enhance the Bookkeeper process.

While the evaluation team was drafting its observations about the results achieved by Bookkeeper processing and about subsequent accelerated aging and independent lab testing of materials treated with Bookkeeper II equipment, PTI and the Library pursued two important, complementary activities:

In light of treatment results obtained with the Bookkeeper process, the Library presented Congress this month [December 1994] with a second deacidification Action Plan, consisting of two phases that will run concurrently for two years (1995-97), if the plan receives Congressional approval.

Phase A: A brief process enhancement initiative with the Bookkeeper process to be followed by a limited production effort. Over a two-year period, this demonstration contract would result in treating 72,000 books. The focus will be on achieving an improved product at lower cost. Since the Bookkeeper process does not impart odors or cause physical damages to treated materials, we expect to make rapid progress with process enhancement. We anticipate that most of this effort will be devoted to the limited production initiative, resulting in deacidification of actual books from the Library's permanent collections.

Phase B: The goal of this phase of the Action Plan, with guidelines to be announced in the Commerce Business Daily, is to encourage and evaluate other technologies that can demonstrate a potential to meet or exceed the Library's deacidification requirements (complete deacidification, adequate alkaline reserve, an increase in the life of paper by at least three times its normal expectancy) without damage to collections. The Library is also hopeful that, during this phase, a U.S.-based company will recognize the potential for commercialization of the DEZ technology and develop a facility for deacidifying books through this process.

The Library's proposed two-year plan reflects our determination to support the active development of mass deacidification technologies. We remain hopeful that our dedication to this effort, combined with mutual involvement by other like-minded institutions, will result in fulfilling the continuing interest of the library and archival communities in resolving one of our most pressing preservation challenges.

*"An Evaluation of the Bookkeeper Mass Deacidification Process." Technical Evaluation Team Report, for the Preservation Directorate, Library of Congress. Pittsburgh, PA, Oct. 1994.

"Mass Deacidification: An Initiative to Refine the Diethyl Zinc Process." Kenneth E. Harris and Chandru J. Shahani, Preservation Directorate, Library of Congress, Washington, DC. Oct. 1994. (The outline summary from this report is reprinted below.)


Summary of DEZ Report

In the summer of 1992, the U.S. Congress approved a Library of Congress (LC) Action Plan aimed at refining the diethyl zinc (DEZ) mass deacidification process and assisting in the development of other deacidification processes. This report deals with the DEZ phase of the two-year initiative. It describes the progress achieved in this effort and recommends changes that should be considered in any future application of the DEZ process.

Background:

Objective of this project:

  1. Minimize these remaining problems in no more than 12 runs in Akzo's pilot plant in Houston, Texas.

The developmental effort:

Operational difficulties:

Optimal performance of Akzo pilot plant:

Conclusions:

DEZ Pros and Cons:

Main advantages:

Disadvantages:

Other assessments of DEZ technology:

Future possibilities:

 [Contents]  [Search]  [Abbey]


[Search all CoOL documents]


URL: http://cool.conservation-us.org/byorg/abbey/an/an18/an18-8/an18-804.html
Timestamp: Sunday, 03-Mar-2013 21:38:24 PST
Retrieved: Saturday, 18-Nov-2017 16:04:35 GMT