A STUDY ON DEVELOPMENT OF CRACKS ON PAINTINGS
3 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
IT HAS been observed that patterns of cracking vary with tension applied before drying, with the rate of drying, and with humidity range. The movements ceased about 1 to 3 hours after the change of humidity.
A pattern resembling “waves” radiating from corners (fig. 1) was observed at tension 30g/cm and at no initial tension (rigid aluminum strainer for the latter), during drying from 93% RH to 83% RH, 93% to 75% RH, and 93% RH to normal humidity. Drying in the higher humidity range gave better-developed cracks than faster drying to normal humidity. From 93% to 83% strains were about 0.1% or more; from 93% to 75%, about 0.08%. Drying from 93% RH to normal humidity gave only faint cracks at 0.05% strain. The cracking always started at longer sides of samples near corners and progressed toward centers. Samples with or without fabric gave the same patterns, clearly resulting from shrinkage of the desiccated size layer.
Crack patterns observed during humidity decrease at low tension. One-quarter of sample shown
Samples with fabric stretched at higher tensions of 200 g/cm (1.11 lb/in) and 350 g/cm (1.96 lb/in) gave very little cracking at corners when dried from 93% RH to 75% RH (min 0.07% strain). The cracks tended to become random toward the center of samples and to concentrate at the edges.
Tacking margin cracks (fig. 2a) were in good agreement with Kilpatrick (1980).
Crack patterns at tacking margins: (a) during humidity decrease; (b) during humidifcation
No cracks were observed on drying from 75% and from lower humidities, even at low rupture strains (0.05%) of the coating and high tension.
The pattern formed at low tension (fig. 1) has been generally recognized as the most typical craquelure on paintings (Keck 1969). Often the regular “waves” and lines perpendicular to edges of a painting become random or disappear toward the center (fig. 3).
Typical craquelure on paintings. One-quarter of sample shown
During restrained contraction of size upon drying, local stresses and overall tension continued to increase. Under low tension, shrinking of size was restricted mainly along rigid stretcher bars, causing extension and cracks perpendicular to the bars. The cracking started where stress was the highest, at areas farthest from the center of rectangular samples, at longer bars near the corners. Cracks would begin to curve, forming the “waves,” since shrinking of size continued toward the center of a sample. Overall tension increased as the humidity continued to drop. At a certain higher tension, stress across the sample and perpendicular to the bars began to reach levels equal to stress along the bars, and a random pattern occurred. With gradual decreases of humidity, more cracking took place along the “typical” lines; during faster drying, random patterns would dominate. It is interesting that the rapid increase in stress did not cause more strain and cracking, as one would expect assuming the elastic behavior of size. Also, strains in the size layer below 75% RH were too small to crack the coating, which was sensitized to very low rupture strain of 0.05%, despite very high stress. The inhibition of movement at high tension can result from an increase in stiffness of the size in the direction of loading. This effect is common for organic, viscoelastic polymers and was investigated for gelatin, the purer form of size (Gupta 1964).
In the elastic model (Kilpatrick 1980; Colville et al. 1982), the typical pattern results from differential drying of a central part of a painting as opposed to sections around edges and over stretcher bars. These sections remain “wet” and relatively unstressed. The typical pattern observed here occurred at low tension with entire samples exposed to free circulation of air. It seems the low tension takes the place of the unstressed outside edge in the elastic model, distribution of stress remaining the same. Many paintings, however, show the “typical” pattern exactly in areas over and along stretcher bars. The occurrence of typical craquelure at edges would not be possible in the FEM model but agrees well with the results of this work.
The effects of humidification were dependent on initial tension applied, period of time elapsed after the change of humidity, and humidity range.
All stretched samples (30 g/cm tension and above) gave exactly the same pattern (fig. 4) when moved from lower to higher humidity, regardless of humidity range (humidities 10% to 33%, 33% to normal humidity, normal to 75%, and 75% to 93% RH were tested). The cracks originated at the corners and spread toward the center. The movement ceased after about 30 minutes for samples without fabric and after 3 hours for samples with fabric. The levels of strain did not seem to exceed 0.12% strain at 30 g/cm for all humidity ranges (not counting the extension within cracks in higher humidities). Samples under no tension did not give this pattern, but exhibited only random swelling with a tendency to expand more lengthwise. Also, when any stretched sample fragments were restrained from moving, the pattern became distorted. The same pattern showed on samples that were allowed to dry previously on rigid strainers and to develop tension of their own (Karpowicz 1985). For lesser tensions, the movement was simultaneous with less pronounced perpendicular cracking.
Crack patterns during humidification: expansion/tension-related movement. One-quarter of sample shown
In higher humidities, for samples at tension 30 g/cm (with and without fabric), 100 g/cm (0.56 lb/in, with fabric) and at no tension on rigid strainers (without fabric), after the initial movement as above, direction of strains changed to give patterns similar to drying (figs. 5, fig. 6). Both movements were separated by placing samples in higher humidity immediately after applying the coating. The “wet” coating was not brittle enough to crack with the initial tension-related movements and cracked later, showing only the second movement. Higher strains were detected in 93% RH (min 0.1% after 20 hours, actual level of strain could approach 1%) than in 75% RH (min 0.05% after 192 hours). No movement was detected in normal and lower humidities.
Crack patterns resulting from restrained shrinkage of size in 93% RH. Samples without fabric; one-quarter of sample shown. Reprinted from Studies in Conservation 34(2):72 with the permission of the International Institute for Conservation of Historic and Artistic Works, 6 Buckingham Street, London, England WC2N 6BA.
Crack patterns resulting from restrained shrinkage in 93% RH. Samples with fabric; one-quarter of sample shown. Reprinted from Studies in Conservation 34(2):72 with the permission of the International Institute for Conservation of Historic and Artistic Works, 6 Buckingham Street, London, England WC2N 6BA.
At higher tension (200g/cm and 350g/cm) in 93% RH (movements in 75% RH not having been investigated) and with the initial tension-related movements eliminated as above, different patterns were obtained (fig. 7).
Crack patterns resulting from creep of fabric at high tension in 93% RH. One-quarter of sample shown
Upon humidification, tacking margins gave cracks exactly perpendicular to drying cracks (fig. 2b). This effect was simultaneous with the initial tension-related movement (fig. 4).
There is little doubt that the initial movement (fig. 4) is a manifestation of an outward pull exerted on the film of size and on the fabric by the rigid bars and is simultaneous with the expansion of the size layer through absorption of water in higher humidity. There is a marked similarity in cracking patterns with those computed as “keying-out” effects (Kilpatrick 1980; Colville et al. 1982). The movements are essentially the same as here, where the expanding size yields to the outside tension. The smaller perpendicular strains at low tension indicate continuation of the expansion in all directions; for higher tensions the overall expansion could have been absorbed by the initial movement.
The initial expansion/tension-related movements stopped after 3 hours for samples with fabric, apparently when the samples reached an equilibrium in higher humidity. This is in good agreement with results by Daly and Michalski (1986), where the dimensional response of fabric-supported samples to changed humidity ceased after 2 to 3 hours. The response of samples without fabric was found here to be faster (30 minutes).
At low tensions, after the initial expansion, distribution of stress changed, as if the size layer (and fabric, if present) began to contract (figs. 5, fig. 6, compare with desiccation on fig. 1). To investigate this effect, a new series of experiments was set up. Samples without fabric were stretched in normal humidity at 30 g/cm and at no tension on strainers. The change of humidity to 93% RH caused expansion, which was manifested in wrinkles perpendicular to edges. After about 20 minutes the samples began to shrink and flatten out; in 45 minutes they were flat and visibly taut.
The tests proved that a size layer is capable of contraction in higher humidities and of developing stress, the distribution of which results in the “typical” pattern of craquelure, provided the tension is low (here less than 200 g/cm for samples with fabric). This phenomenon would be difficult to explain on the basis of purely elastic behavior of size. However, it becomes understandable if nonelastic properties are assumed. For the latter, mechanical properties change depending on the range of humidities in which tests are performed.
The dimensional response of unsupported films of size in different humidities was investigated in detail and found to follow exactly the above expanding and contracting movements (Karpowicz 1989). The layer of size after application on canvas shrank with the loss of moisture. The shrinkage was restrained in plane of the film by the stretcher bars and the underlying fabric. The molecular structure of a film dried in restraint is not the same as that of freely contracted films. Its structure has become strained as well to reflect extension of the film. Below the moisture content of about 17% (Ueno and Ono 1963) (which corresponds to about 70% RH [Bull 1944]), upon reaching its glass transition temperature (Tg), the size enters its glassy state, in which the molecules are immobilized and the strains frozen in the film (Ueno and Ono 1963). When the sized fabric is taken off the stretcher only small elastic contraction is possible; large viscoelastic strains, which took place at higher water content, cannot be relieved. When the restretched sample is exposed to humidities above 70% RH (above Tg), the water content becomes sufficient to plastify the film and the “frozen-in” strains can be released by the overall contraction of the samples. The shrinkage of fabric, known to occur above 80% RH (Mecklenburg 1982), could also have contributed to the movements. Before samples reached moisture content corresponding to Tg, when they were exposed to any of the high humidity levels studied here, they all expanded by swelling to give the initial tension-related movements.
Cracking in the “typical” directions associated with these effects takes place at lower tensions. High tension in higher humidity gave a different pattern (fig. 7), apparently resulting from creep of fabric in the direction of warp.
3.3 Strain-Induced Orientation in the Size Layer
The tacking margin effects on humidification (fig. 2b) show an interesting phenomenon of expansion by swelling in higher humidity lateral to the previous direction of stress and strain, during drying, after application on canvas. The occurrence of an identical crack pattern has been reported for a painting rapidly humidified during a flood (Pocobene and Hodkinson 1987). This effect demonstrates an important property of size: in-plane orientation on the molecular level caused by strain.
The network of collagenlike fibrils in the gelled layer of size on fabric undergoes distortions in the direction of strains during drying and shrinkage (Karpowicz 1989). The fibrils become oriented, with the degree of orientation dependent on the magnitude of strain (Burdygina et al. 1969). At the same time, the decreasing thickness of the film causes compression of the network and orientation of the fibrils parallel to the plane of the film. The maximum orientation seems to occur when water content drops to 85%–78% in the gel (well above Tg) and will be enhanced by slow drying. Gradually the structure becomes too rigid at lower water contents; no orientation is possible below 15% of water in the film in the glassy region below Tg (Coopes 1968). The dried film can be expected to exhibit in-plane orientation of collagenlike fibrils, parallel to the plane of film and in the direction of strains induced by drying.
The effects of orientation would be the highest close to the outside perimeter of paintings, farther from the center, where the highest strains during drying occurred. Also, slow drying in the areas over the stretcher bars would allow more orientation there.
Oriented polymers swell mainly across the axis of fibril orientation, and the anisotropy of swelling is a measure of orientation in polymers (Turner 1948). At the tacking margin the layer of size expanded during humidification (fig. 2b) across the direction of drying strains (fig. 2a). It has been found that isotropic swelling is manifested only by gelatin films unrestrained during drying (Simms and Blake 1960). The presence of orientation in films of size dried in restraint was confirmed by observations of strain-induced birefringence (Karpowicz 1988).