[ARSCLIST] A new definition of "multi-track"--was: Grundig EQ

To: ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [ARSCLIST] A new definition of "multi-track"--was: Grundig EQ
From: "Steven C. Barr(x)" <stevenc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2006 23:15:37 -0400
Comments: To: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@loc.gov>
List-archive: <http://listserv.loc.gov/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=ARSCLIST>
List-help: <http://listserv.loc.gov/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=ARSCLIST>, <mailto:LISTSERV@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV?body=INFO ARSCLIST>
List-owner: <mailto:ARSCLIST-request@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
List-subscribe: <mailto:ARSCLIST-subscribe-request@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ARSCLIST-unsubscribe-request@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
Message-id: <020001c6ece3$85d507a0$0100007f@sympatico.ca>
References: <1CDA3639E0E121409B29360162A504750142BAC7@BLUE-2003.corp.blstk.com>
Reply-to: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@xxxxxxx>

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Scott Phillips" <scottp@xxxxxxxxx>
> <groan> !! 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List
> [mailto:ARSCLIST@xxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Ganesh.Irelan@xxxxxxxx
> I wish it was full track, 2 track or even mono quarter track!  This is
> one mono track out of 4 completely unrelated tracks on 1/4" tape.  
> 
I made up...and still have...a bunch of r-2-r's of my 78's I recorded
that way! Used a single output from a mono player, and only fed one
stereo channel each run-through. They DID sound odd when played in
stereo, though...

Steven C. Barr

References:
- Re: [ARSCLIST] Grundig EQ
  - From: Scott Phillips

Prev by Date: Re: [ARSCLIST] Tape baking question
Next by Date: Re: [ARSCLIST] Tape baking question
Previous by thread: Re: [ARSCLIST] Grundig EQ
Next by thread: [ARSCLIST] Nominations for the 2007 ARSC Awards for Excellence
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Table of Contents]

[ARSCLIST] A new definition of "multi-track"--was: Grundig EQ

[Subject index] [Index for current month] [Table of Contents]